<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Epigenomics on Pierre-François Roux</title>
    <link>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/tags/epigenomics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Epigenomics on Pierre-François Roux</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2021 Pierre-François Roux</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/tags/epigenomics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>ATAC-seq is more than a peak list</title>
      <link>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/2026/06/19/atac-seq-is-more-than-a-peak-list/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/2026/06/19/atac-seq-is-more-than-a-peak-list/</guid>
      <description>Many ATAC-seq analyses stop at peak calling: open regions in condition A, open regions in condition B, differential accessibility. That is useful, but it leaves a lot of information on the table.
ATAC-seq libraries carry several layers of signal: chromatin accessibility, fragment architecture, nucleosome positioning, transcription factor footprints, and sometimes even useful genetic information.
Look At Fragment Classes The fragment length distribution is one of the first things I inspect.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>A QC checklist before trusting ChIP-seq or ATAC-seq peaks</title>
      <link>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/2026/06/19/a-qc-checklist-before-trusting-chip-seq-or-atac-seq-peaks/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/2026/06/19/a-qc-checklist-before-trusting-chip-seq-or-atac-seq-peaks/</guid>
      <description>Peak calling is not the beginning of an epigenomic analysis. It is a consequence of many upstream choices: library quality, mapping behavior, duplication, background, blacklisted regions and replicate structure.
Before interpreting peaks, I like to ask a simple question: would I trust this experiment if I ignored the peak caller entirely?
Start With The Library Check these before any biological interpretation:
 Per-base quality and adapter content. Fraction of aligned reads.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>ATAC-seq as an integrative assay for aging and cancer</title>
      <link>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/project/atac-seq-as-an-integrative-assay-for-aging-and-cancer/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.pierre-francois-roux.com/project/atac-seq-as-an-integrative-assay-for-aging-and-cancer/</guid>
      <description>ATAC-seq is widely used to map chromatin accessibility, but bulk ATAC-seq libraries contain much more information than accessible regulatory elements alone. In recent work, I benchmarked ATAC-seq against matched whole-genome sequencing to evaluate whether a single assay can also recover genetic information relevant to cancer and aging biology.
Using paired datasets from patient-derived melanoma cell lines and TCGA brain tumors, we showed that ATAC-seq can support high-precision small variant detection within accessible regions, robust copy-number profiling, mitochondrial genome characterization and telomere-associated repeat quantification, while preserving its classical epigenomic readouts.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>